The Onion's response. So wonderfully horrible.

Does anyone know who this woman is?

click for high-res

I think she might be famous. Maybe an ice skater.

McDonalds to sell Green Mountain Coffee. The Moonies also like Green Mountain Coffee. Coincidence?

AOL hires Mary Cheney.

POTD

click for high-res

Yes, a week of series.

ExxonMobile is running an apologetic advertisement in the Wall Street Journal today, the gist of which is, "Yes, we are raking in obscene profits, but our profits aren't out of line with those of many other companies (if you look at it the right way)."

Good fun.

I have decided to start wearing Axe body spray. Apparently this will help me score big with the chicks.

Best Freudian slip ever: "...man, woman, or minority..."

POTD

click for high-res

There exists some kind of inverse relationship between how busy I am at work and fatigue. For some time, I've been waiting to start a big project, one that will keep me frenetically busy for months.

In the interim, I've been picking up lots of little things. Not terribly taxing, straightforward things.

But I'm wiped out. Having this damn, lingering cold hasn't helped, but I think my workload has something to do with it. I need something bigger to stay focused.

Wow.

POTD

click for high-res

Having seen Apple's new software Aperture at the PhotoPlus Expo and having done some reading online, I have a few questions and thoughts.

• One of Aperture's strongest features is the how it handles the whole photo library. The library contains RAW images, edited versions, any snapshots you may have created, as well as a huge range of metadata. Very cool. Also cool is how easy Aperture makes backing up the library; plug in a FireWire drive and create a "vault" that backs up all or part of the library. However, Aperture seems designed to use a directly connected main library. It looks as if the main library has to be created on your internal drive(s). Given that every time I go shooting I bring back two gigabytes of images, it wouldn't take long to fill my internal drive. If Aperture can't maintain a catalog of offline vaults or libraries, that is a serious limitation.
• Aperture's editing tools are also impressive. It can non-destructively set white, black, and grey points, adjust exposure, crop, and adjust color channels using a slick versioning scheme. Every edit to a master photo does not actually modify the master. Rather, edits represent instructions applied to the master, much like an edit decision list or photoshop layer (they are not represented as layers, however). This is all very cool, but what is the internal image format? Because adjustments can't be applied as layers, Aperture's usefulness as an editing tool is limited.
• Aperture can pass an image to an external editing tool, like Photoshop. This makes sense given that Aperture lacks most of the filters and plugins that Photoshop has. It isn't clear whether or not Aperture can handle Photoshop layers, or whether images have to be flattened before saving back to Aperture.
• The metadata handling and manipulating tools are excellent. Adobe should really do something like this with Bridge and Photoshop.
• The cataloging and vaulting tools also appear to be excellent and very useful; take a look at these demo clips.
• It seems that Aperture would be a great front-end to Photoshop, replacing the RAW workflow in a tool like Bridge or Extensis Portfolio.
• My concern, however, about using Aperture for RAW processing is that all RAW tools are not created equal. There are noticeable, sometimes shocking differences between the same RAW file converted with the Canon RAW tool and Photoshop's Camera RAW plugin. Photoshop's tool almost universally creates better looking, sharper images. I'd like to see some careful comparisons of Aperture's RAW conversion tool with the Camera RAW plugin.

POTD

click for high-res

I often wonder about the advantages of public versus private education, but I do believe there is one thing people learn in private schools that they do not in public: faking it.

I'm not talking about going through life as a fraud, and, no, I'm not talking about faking orgasms (sick people). I'm referring to ad libbing; improvising.

I can't tell you how many times I've heard, "wow, that was great" only to respond, "yea, but I just made it up." And I'm not terribly good at it.

I think about this all the time in corporate life. There is no plan or "way to do it." Getting things done requires improvisation. People who understand this just get more things done. People who don't understand this mistake improvisation for "knowing a lot of stuff."

And I think that people learn more about ad libbing in private schools. Most of the people I've met who are really good at it learned it there.

POTD

click for high-res

You need help, little man?!